The dazzling colours of the cloth

Today’s post includes an excerpt of something I am writing. It is relevant to recent posts and yesterday’s excerpt on patriarchy. It slightly touches upon agency and circumstances, the underlying religious or political ideologies, and the socio-economic systems these support or reflect. Patriarchy is a structure that was never meant to support connectedness, egalitarian relationships or equal opportunities. It permeates many religious, political, health, educational, employment, relational and familial contexts.

(Excerpt from a longer thread)

‘…… People are made redundant because of the way economies are set up and they receive poor health care because of the nature of the existing care system policies. Women are paid less or fired first because of inequity at the work place. Since, it is not possible to live in a vacuum, the laws of nature and societal realities impact all aspects of our life to a varying degree. Thus, the agency we exert is dependent on external and internal factors…….  Exteriority and interiority are always locked in a dance……..  In my early twenties I worked at the conveyor belt of a pharmaceutical factory putting pills in containers. After a while I was asked to move to a different department, which was separated from the big ground floor area by glass because it was toxic. A group of women worked around a long table, some of them wearing medical masks. When I initially got hired I had been asked if I wanted to work in that department because the pay was higher. I had turned down the offer bearing in mind my early asthma history. One Friday afternoon before leaving I was summoned by the supervisor, who told me I would be working in the glassed section starting on Monday. Seeing my disappointment he gave me a pat on the shoulder and said I should be glad I would be earning more money. I looked at the women through the glass panels. They seemed to be doing fine. On my first day I observed that despite the focus that counting pills into containers required, working around a table supported a constant flow of story telling…. Working at a conveyor belt was different. One was immersed in fast counting and packing. Hand movements became automated, but the counting didn’t leave room for reverie and mind wandering. There wasn’t much interaction with others. I had thought it might be okay after all. But it did not take long for breathing and allergy type symptoms to appear. I found that my scope of agency within that context was limited to two choices. I could quit or keep working and get sick.……..

This last dozen of years I have constantly faced the dilemma of questioning and breaking the silence or remaining silent. In her book, Refuge, Terry Tempest Williams writes: ‘I must question everything, even if it means losing my faith, even if it means becoming a member of a border tribe among my own people. Tolerating blind obedience in the name of patriotism or religion ultimately takes our lives.’ For me breaking the silence has brought on a lot of additional suffering, but also, the knowing that silence doesn’t always protect. Neither does it change beliefs or stop dynamics at play. One way to deepen the understanding and accelerate the waking up to the working of things is to pick up the thread of each event, injustice, loss or decision, and follow it all the way back to its origins. One is bound to observe repetition of patterns and underlying dynamics below the surface of the frozen lake. Each new realisation increases our capacity for presence. As we discern more of the threads we catch a glimpse of the breadth and the dazzling colours of the cloth.’

Emotions

‘So take a new approach as to how you feel emotions. It’s not about the right emotion or the wrong emotion; it’s about honoring the way that you’re feeling. We tend to think that being sensitive is a weakness, but it really gives us an ability to be compassionate and to appreciate so many things in the world’ Jessica Ortner

An excerpt from the article: The Long Shadow of Patriarchy by Terry Real, LICSW and author

‘Let me be clear. I haven’t been for 40 years, nor will I ever be, neutral on the issue of patriarchy in my work. Traditional gender roles are a bad deal for both sexes. And they’re particularly toxic for men. The evidence couldn’t be clearer. In fact, the World Health Organization (WHO) has issued a statement implicating traditional masculine values as inimical to good health. Let’s take a stark, bottom-line issue: death. Men live 7 to 10 years less than women do, not because of some genetic differences, as most people imagine, but because men act like, well, men. For one, we don’t seek help as often as women do; it’s unmanly. Indeed, as I once wrote about male depression, “A man is as likely to ask for help with depression as he is to ask for directions.” And men are more noncompliant with treatment when we do get it. Also, we take many more risks. That driver without a seatbelt—odds are that’s a man. Men drink more, take drugs more, are more than three times as likely to be imprisoned, and five times as likely to commit suicide.

Traditional masculine habits not only hurt men’s physical and psychological health, but also produce the least happy marriages. Study after study has shown that egalitarian marriages—which often involve dual careers and always encompass shared housework and decision-making—unequivocally lead to higher rates of marital satisfaction for both sexes than do “traditional” marriages, based on hierarchy and a strict division of roles. Yet most therapists, even today, act as if these choices in marriage were simply a matter of personal preference, of legitimate, sometimes clashing values. Where do we stand on issues like toxic masculinity and paternalistic marriage? For the most part, we don’t stand anywhere.

Cut from the Old Cloth

Like most feminist therapists I know, I don’t want to “feminize” men any more than I want to “masculinize” women. I want choice. When the moment calls for combat, I want men to be ferocious. But when the moment calls for tenderness, I want men to be sweet, compassionate, soft. Mostly, I want men to be able to discern which moment is which and behave accordingly. I want men to hold fast to those elements that are good and right about the traditional male role—courage, loyalty, competence—but ………. have access to emotion, particularly the vulnerable emotions that connect us to one another……..’

An excerpt from Dr Kim D’Eramo’s book: The Mind Body Toolkit

‘A large proportion of these neural networks are located in the area around the heart. These nerve networks around the heart respond to neurotransmitters (brain chemicals) in the same way the brain does. Interestingly, the nerves in the area of the heart send large amounts information and signals to the brain that control brain activity. In fact, there is more information from the heart going to the brain to control and modulate brain function than from the brain to control the heart. The research has shown that the heart and emotional state play a far more significant role in controlling brain function and organ activity than previously thought. In fact, studies by The Center of Heart Math have found that the nerve activity around the level of the heart can be measured to have impact throughout the body and even beyond the body. This electromagnetic energy of the heart can be detected at distances of up to eight to ten feet away from the body. The cellular activity in the nerve cells around the heart creates a field of electromagnetic energy that changes depending on the emotional state of the person. This activity is considered either “concordant” or “discordant.” The “concordant” activity harmonizes organ function: evening out the heart rate, normalizing blood pressure, and instilling smooth respiratory function. The “discordant” activity causes erratic variability in the heart rate, irregularity in the breathing, and abnormal shifts in the blood pressure. The “concordant” activity is detected in the area around the heart when a person is experiencing harmonic emotions, such as love, joy, peace and appreciation. “Discordant” activity is detected from the area around the heart when a person is experiencing disharmonic emotional states like anger, fear, frustration or impatience…… Therefore, your emotional state is directly linked to the quality of physiologic activity in your body.’

An anniversary, a memoir and a film  (Edited)

“…..authority is respected, obedience is revered, and independent thinking is not. I was taught as a young girl not to “make waves” or “rock the boat.”…… “Just let it go,” Mother would say. “You know how you feel, that’s what counts.”

“I recommend a simple mastectomy. It’s an easy procedure, basically like cutting off a mole ..” (Terry Tempest Williams)

On birthdays of loved ones and family we return and remember. Likewise, on anniversaries that mark the passing away of people we also return.   We may also seek stories, films or activities that can connect us to this event and to our common humanity. Over this last week leading up to my mother’s passing away three years ago I have been reading Refuge: An Unnatural History of Family and Place, and also, got the chance to watch a new film by Pedro Almodovar, Pain and Glory, at the local cinema.

Pedro Almodovar’s film, Pain and Glory, contains many stories within stories. It is a story of memory, loss, addiction, suffering, love, the origins of creation and art and creators.  This film is less raw and intense than his other films. It is almost contemplative, and just as beautiful in terms of its vibrant colours, art, story and image. The film opens with the main character closing his eyes and drifting away. He is sitting on a chair at the bottom of a swimming pool. He might be meditating or drowning. One interesting theme is that as his chronic physical pains and ailments disappear for a while they create space for images from his childhood and his past to arise, as if the pain in itself is a wall that keeps the past at bay. Remembering will bring him back to life. He also realizes that he has not grieved or recovered from either his mother’s passing away or a serious surgery he had two years ago. As he revisits his childhood in a poor village in Valencia, aspects of his Catholic boarding school education, his relationship with his mother and the social and religious underpinnings that influenced him and their relationship, and also, as he reconnects with people he once knew and explores past events and choices, an awakening of desire to take care of his health, to create and live takes place.

The memoir is written by Terry Tempest Williams, who is an author, and was also a curator of education and naturalist-in-residence at the Utah Museum of Natural History in Salt Lake City. In this account she reconstructs the journey of her mother’s and grandmother’s passing away to cancer and the devastation of a natural habitat. One story informs the other and the environmental loss becomes the holding container for her familial losses and personal pain. We also get glimpses of the socio-cultural events, policies, stories and beliefs that influence the personal, the familial, and the flora and fauna of their common homeland.

In the prologue of her book she writes:

‘In the past seven years, Great Salt Lake has advanced and retreated. The Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge, devastated by the flood, now begins to heal. Volunteers are beginning to reconstruct the marshes just as I am trying to reconstruct my life. I sit on the floor of my study with journals all around me. I open them and feathers fall from their pages, sand cracks their spines, and sprigs of sage pressed between passages of pain heighten my sense of smell— and I remember the country I come from and how it informs my life. Most of the women in my family are dead. Cancer. At thirty-four, I became the matriarch of my family. The losses I encountered at the Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge as Great Salt Lake was rising helped me to face the losses within my family. When most people had given up on the Refuge, saying the birds were gone, I was drawn further into its essence. In the same way that when someone is dying many retreat, I chose to stay……. Perhaps, I am telling this story in an attempt to heal myself, to confront what I do not know, to create a path for myself with the idea that “memory is the only way home.” I have been in retreat. This story is my return. TTW JULY 4, 1990’